hey you! sign up and become a contributing writer to this site! no blogging experience required! register here then leave a comment here!!
« Nas/ Untitled CD review
» We need an auto industry bailout

Representative Thaddeus McCotter on the auto bailout

11.21.08 | technician | In auto, ford, livonia, bailout

This post somehow got deleted so here it is again:

On November 19, Thaddeus McCotter, Republican Michigan Representative from Livonia spoke at the Financial Services Committee hearing about a “bailout” for the domestic auto industry, using 25 billion of the $700 billion being given to Wall Street as a bridge loan to the auto industry. Regardless of what side of the aisle you’re on I found his approximately 8 minutes speech quite eloquent as an argument for why the American government should give aid in this crisis. I have taken the time to transcribe the eight minute speech and you can watch a video of it on YouTube.

Representative Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan’s 11th District at the Financial Services Committee hearing on November 19th, 2008 (this transcription is unofficial and less than 100% accurate):

I come from Michigan’s 11th District my district borders Detroit. Heavy automotive industry. A lot of dealers, a lot of suppliers, a lot of white collar, a lot of blue-collar employees.

One of the first things I would like to make clear that I personally find offensive is the implication that the domestic American auto industry has not done anything since the 1970s to restructure. If anyone believes the Big 3 were not restructuring prior to the credit crisis bringing them here today or the CAFE mandates that have brought them here today I invite you to my district. I invite you to look at how the fragile fabric of people’s lives has been rendered asunder by a necessary process that has involved give-and-take on both sides, from labor and management. I’ll show you the white collar workers that are out of work. I’ll show you the blue-collar workers that are out of work. I will show you the pensioners that are worried about their health retirement benefits being lost. And I will show you the Wixom assembly plant that is closed.

I bring this up not for your pity for my constituents. I bring this up to show you that the automotive companies and the UAW have been doing what they believe they possibly can to restructure and become globally competitive and to ensure that America has a domestic manufacturing base for the generations to come.

The second point I wish to bring up is why they’re here. Throughout the entire process of the restructuring we would hear rumors in Washington that the Big 3 were coming for a federal assistance package for one reason or another. And yet as the white collar workers, and the blue-collar workers, and the pensioners suffered the restructuring they did not come. They did not come to Washington with their hands out. They did not come begging as it has been pejoratively put in the press. They wanted to restructure without us making it harder for them to do so. Unfortunately, the first thing we did as Congress was passed a $100,000,000,000 CAFE standard mandate on the auto industry which would have been far worse if not for the strenuous work of the Dean of the United States Congress, John Dingell.

Secondly, through no fault of their own as they went through the restructuring process the whiz kids on Wall Street with their computer algorithms decided to screw up the entire credit market of the United States. This was critical to the restructuring of the industry. And then this Congress, in my opinion, passed a very bad piece of legislation. A $700 billion bailout of the very same people on Wall Street who caused the problem. And now you see hundreds of billions of dollars slated to go to “healthy banks” to free up the credit system that has yet to free up or they would not be here today. So the question that the chairman puts before us in terms of legislation that he is proposing is to me not a matter of bad policy that has already been imposed on the American people that has yet to work. It becomes a question of equity.

If the $25 billion is appropriated for Wall Street, some of it probably targeted to healthy financial institutions however nebulously defined, a no vote on the bridge loan to the auto industry means that the 25 billion will continue to go to Wall Street and to healthy banks. A yes vote means that it will actually go to Main Street not just for the structure of the Big 3, the labor leaders, the auto leaders but for the very hard-working men and people whose taxes have gone into the $700 billion bailout which has yet to free up the credit markets. So we are in the realm of equity here. And while I do not support that policy we had here yesterday Secretary Paulson who explained that he believed one of the fundamental problems that we face in stabilizing the financial system is the problem with home foreclosures. I would agree with that.

I would agree that the biggest problem we have is real working people’s ability to pay to stay in the homes that they have. If we turn our back on main street, if we continue to send all the money to Wall Street which caused the problem and the auto industry does have to go into bankruptcy you’ll see foreclosure rates skyrocket from people who played by the rules and are currently paying their mortgages and are not part of the problem that Mr. Paulson has said is already big enough to be worthy of addressing.

Finally, I want to address the issue of labor costs. I have long said that one of the problems that Michigan suffers is that we are currently still operating under the industrial welfare model of governance. And this is where the Big 3 and the UAW get a very bad rap. They talk about “shutting labor costs that have been duly negotiated because it makes them uncompetitive.” My response to that is where do those labor costs go?

The traditional model of governance throughout the 20th century of the United States as we were an industrial power was that business would pick up some of the benefits of employees and government would pick up some of the social needs of employees and there was always the tension of who would do what but you had two pillars to help undergird American prosperity.

As we move into what people call the new global economy, the postindustrial economy, my question is this: if the business entities in negotiation with labor entities decide they can no longer be competitive with these “labor costs,” where do those go? They’re going to go to the federal government. So we have another instance where we can be penny wise and pound foolish and we can say we’re not sending a $25 billion bridge loan to let the auto industry survive and we can let real human beings go into the process of bankruptcy and watch the stresses and strains on their families as they endure that pain and you will not have saved the American taxpayer anything. Because the pension costs will be picked up somewhere from the retirees that have been cheated out of a lifetime of hard work, you’ll see the healthcare costs of the fruit of their labor put in to the federal system. And you’ll see prosperity throughout the Midwest and the rest of the country crash and you will not have enough worker retraining money to take care of their needs.

And finally for some of my more conservative friends I point this out. If America does not have a manufacturing base, a manufacturing base that some may think is not necessary in this new global world, the United States will cease to be able to defend itself. We will be reliant on other nations for the innovative technologies, not only for their creation but for their provision, from friendly nations such as Communist China and and the Arsenal of Democracy in our lifetime will have been dismantled in a time of war. In the end this issue is larger than the Big 3, in many ways larger than the economy, it is what type of nation do we become. Do we become a nation that no longer produces wealth, that no longer has a path to middle-class prosperity. Do we remain the America that we inherited or do we just let it go and watch real people suffer in the process and my answer is no.


Leave a comment

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. Subscribe to these comments.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



« Nas/ Untitled CD review
» We need an auto industry bailout